Many years ago, when buzzword bonanza was hitting the world of business books, I wrote a joke booklet with the name: In Search of the One-Minute Megatrends. I was happy to see that I could include pieces of titles from three popular books at the time. Had I actually published such a book, it would likely have risen to the top of the heap, just based on the title alone. People like buzzwords. For one thing, they absolve you of actually having to think about the thing being described.
I mention this because we are seeing a buzzword blast in education today that I think we should step back from a bit and think about quite carefully before jumping on the bandwagon. I’m speaking of the so-called “flipped” classroom where students view instructional lectures online from home, and use class time to do “homework” with the active support of the teacher and, one would hope, peers. The premise is that the online world is ubiquitous in student homes, even though one-to-one computing in schools is still a distant dream. Every kid (it is assumed) will just pop online after dinner and watch a series of online lectures that (presumably) stick like mental superglue to their noggins. Free from the distraction of chatting with friends, posting on Facebook, or doing other social things, our kids will gladly take their own time to watch such riveting videos as The Commutative Law of Addition found on the Khan Academy site. I can’t wait for the Oscar nominations to come rushing in for these gripping titles!
OK, let’s buy the idea that this riveting YouTube entry is better that the average cat video, what chance do students have to ask for help as the presentation is proceeding? The answer, of course, is none. The video plays until the end and that’s it. There are post-tests given to be sure you learned what the video told you and, if you are lucky, you might even remember the material until the next day. But, if you are confused, there is no recourse – no chance to interrupt the teacher to get clarification. Even B. F. Skinner never went this far – he provided feedback throughout the process of his classes. But many educators don’t realize that B. F. Skinner said shortly before his death in 1990, “The worst mistake my generation has made is to treat people as if they were rats.”

It’s good to read something not so gung-ho positive about “flipped classrooms”. I like the idea of having content available from home but still also teaching explicitly (also including inquiry & PBL activities) in the classroom. Whether students have access to great Internet at home or not ignores the fact that many students DO NOT want to study at home! Let our kids be kids and have lives outside of school that does not revolve around school.
Short, informative videos or materials combined with activity in the classroom that is project-based, plus highly engaged teacher(s) can provide powerful. Inquiry, higher level thinking, etc. can easily be part of the flip. Just as easily (or maybe more so), when the flip is dull vid combined with dull, unengaging assignments and uninvolved teachers, we have, simply, poor teaching. Continental Classroom Physics with Harvey White (1958-60–remember?) could have been spectacular if paired with a strong classroom component.
I agree. Good videos can be used to provide driving questions that lead to wonderful projects. That is the core of PBL. But a passive video “teaching” the factorization of polynomials does me no good if I get stuck. Having to wait for the next day to get my questions answered just makes things worse. Also, if the videos are so short (most are about 10 minutes in length) why not show them in class and then leave the rest of the day for interactions.
So nice to read a considered piece on educational fads with the student at the heart. It seems that common sense and hope for a different view on traditional aspects of education are still on the minds of passionate educators. Thanks!
I smile nervously at your new title!
Buzzword or not, any methodology that increases student engagement will enhance learning. The key in allowing the class time to be more interactive instead of hoping students don’t mentally check out while teachers are talking.
I’m all for more classroom interaction, but why do we need passive videos at all? How will students be engaged in watching passive videos at home?
I believe the goal is not to do traditional homework in class, but to move it beyond recall towards sustained projects with inquiry and higher order thinking. Yes, the videos can be boring, but no more so than a lecture. But, if you want them to be more interesting, keep them short and link in other sources including primary sources, credible websites and even other videos. The videos are used to present the basic background information and then class time can be used in exactly the ways you suggest.
The real problem to me seems to be that people think that technology will solve the problems, it won’t. What can solve problems is using technology (or a technique) in creative ways by educators (people) to engage students by enlisting them as knowledge creators (not as vessels to be filled) and thereby making learning relevant to the world today. Of course as you point out, a flaw in this logic is the assumption that students will watch what they won’t read. If there is no accountability for not watching, then they won’t. Basically, it isn’t the tool, it is how it is used and as Jon Bergmann (who helped start the flipped classroom concept) notes, it might not work for all classes or grade levels. See: http://flipped-learning.com/?p=577
The advantage of a lecture is that the confused learner can interrupt for clarification – something that canned videos lack. As for the ideal videos, I agree – they should be short, have some (but not all) links, and lead to good questions. If there are any that meet these criteria on the Khan Academy site, please bring them to my attention. Also, as I said elsewhere, if videos are short, show them in the classrooms where they can be discussed by peers.
You are absolutely right about canned videos not allowing for clarification or immediate feedback. Unfortunately, most teachers who include videos as part of a blended curriculum will surely use canned videos.
As teachers and the technology evolves, more will surely be done to include live discussion boards along with teacher-created videos. I primarily use video lessons delivered at home for optional acceleration and remediation. A form collects student responses and questions and notifies me via email (this is how students receive credit, and more importantly — feedback).
I started making videos of my lessons last year after hearing about “flipped teaching” from my principal. I have had the most success using videos in the actual classroom, whether individually, in small groups, or even whole class. When I prepare a lesson beforehand, I can streamline it and make a 10 minute presentation 3 or 4 minutes. My students also are more attentive to video me! I will usually use this time to conference with another group or individual, or to set up the next activity.
Without discussion, questions, and feedback, these videos are mostly a waste of time. If used as a way to stimulate student thinking and questioning, videos can tap into reserves of otherwise unrealized student curiosity and potential.
If used for one-size-fits-all transmission of knowledge, videos (like any other method) will fall short. If used, based on assessment, as a way to deliver timely instruction, video can free up the instructor and students time for more authentic and constructive learning tasks.
Does your book include information on STEM? If it did, I would buy it!
This is where the workshop model comes in: demonstration, common execution, group or individual work. Conferring allows students to converse, ask questions to the teachers, and apply concepts. It has worked well in my classroom…
Just like anything in life it is about balance. Flip classrooms are a great tool for education, but it is one of many. As for as passive videos at home, please keep in mind that as always they are meant to help student (& parents) get the most cost effective face time from their teacher. It is not meant to be for all students or teachers. Where I believe it works best is in the differentiated classroom, on the higher end of the class.